ext_305119 ([identity profile] pocket1.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] pocket1_pita 2005-09-09 06:23 pm (UTC)

too funny - i'm not sure i should even respond as runner seems to have made himself pretty clear on the matter. who knew your dog was such a bush-hater?

Anyway, you did a better job of illustrating the roveian reduction than i could have. first of all, no moderates or liberals cite Ann Coulter as a spokesperson for the conservative movement, which is what would be required in a Roveian Reduction. while i'd like to think it's because we don't play like that, truthfully it probably has more to do with the extreme pain and nausea involved in tuning in to Coulter. the second part of your roveian reduction is that you pretended that what i was saying was - we should throw out the whole bankruptcy bill as I am opposed to cracking down on bankruptcy declaration. what i actually said was - we should be able to declare bankruptcy in the face of a natural disaster. the natural disaster clause was thrown out of the bill. that is cruel and dangerous.

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting